Retirement costs hit Slidell hard

Mayor proposes hiring freeze

By Erik Sanzenbach
St. Tammany News
Published on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 12:27 AM CST



There were no smiling faces at a special meeting of the Slidell City Council Monday afternoon.

Mayor Ben Morris, who called the meeting, told the council that he had recently been given some bad news about the city’s share of paying for the benefits of the employees’ retirement system.

According to Morris, the actuarial experts in the state government told him Thursday that the city’s share of contribution to the Slidell Police Department’s retirement system is going up to 32 percent in 2011, up from the 18.5 percent the city is paying for in 2010. The municipal employees retirement system contribution is not going up that much, up to 23.5 percent for 2011 from 22.75 percent in 2010.

However, the raise in the police retirement system contribution will go up $612,0000 and an increase to $56,000 for the municipal employees, for a grant total of $668,000

“This puts a real crimp in the 2011 budget,” Morris said. “We really got hammered.” The 2011 budget is to be presented to the council April 1.

“This was a hit we were not expecting,” the mayor said.

Add to that the estimates that city sales tax collection will decrease by $1.7 million and the mayor and his administration are faced with a lot of hard choices.

For instance, the mayor is looking into policies that would decrease the number of take home cars, the possibility that the city will go on a four day work week, reducing city cell phone use, and instituting a hiring freeze, except for six much-needed positions in the police department.

Morris told the council he is still studying the effects of a hiring freeze. Director of Public Operations Mike Noto said he is compiling numbers on take home cars, but he said reducing the number of such vehicles is on the horizon.

“Having less cars will happen in the future,” Noto said.

The administration is also thinking of using money from its reserve funds to plug up holes in the budget.

State Rep. Kevin Pearson, who was at the meeting explained that the state has nine separate retirement systems that cover police, firefighters, sheriff’s offices and other government employees. When the stock market collapsed in 2008, a lot of the retirement systems took a big hit as their investments lost millions of dollars. Then when the retirees in these separate systems asked for cost of living adjustments, that put even more strain on the systems.

“When you get a lower rate of return on your investment, that means the cities pay a higher share,” Pearson said. “You either have to increase membership in the system or increase the contribution of the city.”

Both Morris and Pearson said Slidell is not alone with this problem. Morris said that other cities in the parish that have police departments are facing huge increases in their share of contributions to retirement systems. Pearson warned that with the shaky national economy, things might get worse.

“If the market declines again, it won’t be pretty,” Pearson said.

Morris wondered if things could not get worse with the new federal budget introduced Monday by the Obama administration.

Police Chief Freddie Drennan said that retirement issues have been central to the Association of Police Chiefs for the past eight years.

Council members like Joe Fraught and Ray Canada were upset with the type of investing done by the retirement systems, and said something has to be changed on the state level.

Canada said the state should look at the federal government retirement system, where the future retirees, combined with investments, share the contribution costs. With that system, if the market fails, at least the system still has revenue coming in to fund the retirement program.

Morris said there was some good news in the city’s finances. He said the cost for health insurance benefits has decreased and stabilized.

“Nobody will see an increase in their health insurance premiums,” Morris said. He also said that utility costs by the city have also decreased, and the money used for travel expenses barely makes up 1 percent of the city’s overall budget.

Morris and Finance Director Sharon Howes said that there would be a balance budget for 2011, despite the extra expenditures.

“I’m not predicting doom and gloom,” Morris told the council. He said that even with all the rebuilding after Katrina it was done without any debt to the city.

“Come hell or high water, we will not go over budget,” Morris claimed.

However, Councilman at-large Landon Cusimano was worried that dipping into the city’s reserve funds would handcuff the incoming administration in July. He said that if the city uses $4 million in reserves to plug the budget holes that will leave only $1 million in the reserves for the new mayor and council.

“I just want to know how are they going to replenish the reserve funds,” Cusimano said.

Howes said that there is enough money in the reserve funds.

Everybody agreed that the council and administration should meet for a series of budget workshops before a final 2011 budget was presented. Howes said with the new problems, she would need extra time to get the budget ready for introduction to the council.


Comments

20 comment(s)

    Free Speech wrote on Feb 15, 2010 1:44 PM:

    " Both of you make good points. Slidell is going to be suffering in the future as NASA shuts down. For decades Slidell has been a bedroom community to NO East and Stennis. Now that the Obama administration has essentially shut down NASA after the last space shuttle launch, Slidell will be hard hit and the already bad economy will get worse, much worse for the Northshore. With virtually no economic development in Slidell, these folks will move elsewhere and the types of jobs these folks did has a very limited avenue. "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 10, 2010 2:00 PM:

    " I don't disagree with the need for economic development. However, regarding retirement costs, most companies have 401k with employees kicking in and companies matching, etc. It's not unheard of. Also, if the current retirement system bankrupts the city, won't my refusal (if that were my position) to participate in the costs sort of cut off my nose to spite my face? I still find it odd that you continue to believe the admin is doing a fine job though. Also, your points are starting to meander. Anyway, I tire of this discussion. "

    Free Speech wrote on Feb 10, 2010 8:39 AM:

    " Folks, back in the early 80's the City could not afford to give the workers a raise so they voted to increase the percentage contributed to employees retirement with the employee contributing the balance. This was done several times until the City finally contributed 100% of the retirement. City employees do not pay into the Social Security system. Being a government entity they don't have too. So unless an employee has all his quarters in prior to coming to the City they will not receive benefits or very reduced benefits if they did. "

    Clinton Billedeaux wrote on Feb 9, 2010 11:34 AM:

    " So Business As Usual, Are you volunteering to pay for your retirement benefits instead of letting the taxpayers pay for them? I can't say much about city workers. I think Slidell pays its employees very well, but its citizens really need to find a skillset that produces something that people elsewhere want. The city isn't going to survive off of Textron and tourism. I just thank the stars we didn't set the stage for a casino here. Heaven help us if the "leaders" of this city go that route. "

    Busines as Usual wrote on Feb 9, 2010 9:46 AM:

    " Then I guess you are a real man Clinton but perhaps I work for the city, I am displeased and don't want retribution. I'm sure you thought of that though. I guess you should just re-elect Ben and keep paying him. He's awesome and nothing is wrong. Not sure why the Sentry even wrote this article, apparently it isn't even newsworthy. Take care "

    Sam S wrote on Feb 8, 2010 7:52 PM:

    " I watched the council meeting a couple weeks ago. They are trying real hard to cut the budget by eliminating cell phones, take home cars etc... This will result in a very small saving. I did notice that not one council person or the mayor asked the CEO how much they would save if the employees contributed to their pension instead of the city paying 100% of it for them. This would result in huge saving for the city. Where's the leadership? "

    Clinton Billedeaux wrote on Feb 6, 2010 6:04 PM:

    " I see I'm the only one who's putting my name on what I write here. That's fine. I'm not running for any office or supporting anyone for office, so I'm hiding an agenda. I think using a name like "Business As Usual" sort of speaks for itself when it comes to political statements. As for spending, I suppose all people would be better served by governments who operated as if they had no money in the budget. It's silly I suppose to assume that planning for growth should be second to planning for what political opponents will say. "

    Jen in Slidell wrote on Feb 5, 2010 8:42 PM:

    " I say fire every city employee and bring in new ones from Detroit, who will just be ecstatic to have a job. The mayor represents the citizens of Slidell, not its employees. Heck , we have to send our water bill to COVINGTON for processing. City still operates out of trailers 5 years later & Ben is on Facebook announcing some city funded Arts event every other day. "

    R U Kidding wrote on Feb 5, 2010 7:05 PM:

    " Ben's entire little cowboy image, is just what he wants you to believe. His fighting with FEMA and evryone else for the good of our city is a joke. It's a "show" for the shallow minded people who really believe that he is ruff and tough. It's obivious he does not believe in term limits, although the voters do. Keep electing him, he is BIG AND BAD "

    My 2 Cents wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:30 AM:

    " Jim B - Ben did not structure the current benefit package. He is doing what any good leader would do and that is protect what his employees already have. If you want to put blame on anyone go way back to when Sam was mayor and those council members looking out for themselves and created the benefits to their advantage. They couldn't just pass it for only them so everybody was included. Mayors don't vote on ordinances or resolutions. The council does. "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:09 AM:

    " And Jim B thanks for reading between the lines here. Correct, the mayor didn't reduce spending and thus taxes as Clinton suggests he couldn't (obviously), but what he COULD and SHOULD have done was make recomendations to change expense levels on a proactive rather than reactive basis, when he KNEW this was going to happen. But it really won't matter, he'll be police chief soon (again, maybe, hopefully not) and it'll be the new mayor's problem. Until Ben or Freddy is term limited out again and then they'll switch back again I guess. "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:07 AM:

    " He was warned this was coming, not only did he do nothing of his own free will, but fought against the city council recommendations and went so far as to send the budget to the AG to question the legality! But hey, I guess since he didn't bankrupt the city (I'll give you that) then in your eyes he's doing his job. What he did do, was irresponsibly weaken the emergency fund so the city is now more vulnerable, but hey, that is the next administrations problem I suppose. And maybe ours. "

    Clinton Billedeaux wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:02 AM:

    " Jim B., I believe you're mistaken about the city paying 100% of premiums for current employees and their families. Also, city employees haven't had a raise in 3 years. How long would you work for your employer if you didn't get a raise year after year? This city needs to produce something besides complaints that the mayor isn't doing anything, so my question to you is: How can we (me and you, not the mayor or the council) make Slidell more productive in order to bring money into this city instead of seeing it leave? "

    Jim B wrote on Feb 4, 2010 8:35 PM:

    " It is time for Ben to go home. He was told by most of the council (Of course except for Kim)that this was going to happen. The city pays full benefits for everyone who retired, current employees and their families. No company anywhere does this and it seems no one on the council will stand up to the mayor and do was is right for the tax payers. "

    My 2 Cents wrote on Feb 4, 2010 12:46 PM:

    " If you can do a better job then run for Mayor and stop complaining. You have to give Ben credit for going toe to toe with FEMA and saving this city millions in rebuilding cost. He implemented a program using trustee labor in rebuilding projects saving this city thousands in labor cost. He was the right person in right position during Katrina and the aftermath. You have to give him that. "

    Clinton Billedeaux wrote on Feb 4, 2010 12:15 PM:

    " Business A.U., you've still got me at a loss for understand what exactly you see that's a problem? It's not like the city has come to a screeching halt, and the mayor is saying there's no money left to run the city. Instead, what they're saying okay, now we know exactly what we have to do because we know exactly what the expenses will be. Your saying the mayor should have paid the light bill before the utility company reads the meter, and that's just insisting on the impossible. "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 4, 2010 9:42 AM:

    " I only post because I find it ridiculous that they are pretending this is "new news". The city council predicted this and tried to make changes early on. However, Ben opposed it vehemently, even sending the budget to the AG to be reviewed for "legality" because he felt they overstepped their authority. Cut and paste the links below, it's all there, or search the papers archives under an advanced search.

    "We should know by next December." Well, it's February, and now we know, he was wrong.

    Non-sequitor? Hardly!!

    slidellsentry.com/articles/2009/06/26/news/doc4a44cb8728de6147066559.txt

    slidellsentry.com/articles/2009/06/12/news/doc4a3261311b99d457402137.txt "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 4, 2010 9:36 AM:

    " Clinton,

    If you think it's not the Mayor's job to control the budget for the City of Slidell then exactly what is it that you think he should do for his $100K+ per year? Cut ribbons and kiss babies.

    This problem (declining tax revenue) was not a secrect. I think everyone that can read a paper or watch the news knows the economy is on the decline, hence, declining tax revenues. In fact, even presented with the facts, our current Mayor opposed decreasing the salary of the Mayor and cutting of fleet vehicles. "

    Clinton Billedeaux wrote on Feb 3, 2010 4:03 PM:

    " Business as Usual? Your comment seems like a giant, self-serving non-sequitor. First of all, it isn't the mayor or the police chief spending less in Slidell that has reduced sales tax revenues by almost two million dollars. Second, it isn't the mayor or the police chief who control the retirement fund's investments, so I really don't see how you can lay at their door a nearly 200% increase in what the city is forced to contribute to the funds. This is a legitimate series of events and these leaders are doing a fine job dealing with them early. "

    Business as Usual wrote on Feb 3, 2010 10:28 AM:

    " Freddy and Ben. Ben and Freddy. Switching hats and doing a fantastic job of protecting their own interests. Blaming in on the stock market. It is YOUR JOB to protect the city using our tax dollars. The simple fact is the city contribution for retirement is too high and they didn't properly budget for it. These guys have been in power for the past 8 to 16 years, respectively. This one is on them. If the citizens of Slidell re-elect these two, expect more of the same. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. They review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The St. Tammany News is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
* Personal Information (phone numbers, addresses, etc.)

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in thesttammanynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the St. Tammany News. The St. Tammany News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized St. Tammany News spokespersons.

Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count: